[FederalRegisterCompliancePulse](/v/federalregistercompliancepulse) / compare

# Labor Department; Employment and Training Administration vs Labor Department; Employee Benefits Security Administration: FederalRegisterCompliancePulse comparison

**Labor Department; Employment and Training Administration (2026-08-20) and Labor Department; Employee Benefits Security Administration (2026-11-02) are peer FederalRegisterCompliancePulse records.**

Data as of 2026-11-04 · [Compiled by Zalwin](/research/federalregistercompliancepulse) from Federal Register API (Office of the Federal Register) Copy citation

Download the newest 500 FederalRegisterCompliancePulse records (CSV) — $4.99 →

Both records plus every comparable record, with all columns and source links · Card, Apple Pay, Google Pay or Link via Stripe

## How does Labor Department; Employment and Training Administration compare to Labor Department; Employee Benefits Security Administration?

| Field | Labor Department; Employment and Training Administration | Labor Department; Employee Benefits Security Administration |
|---|---|---|
| Agency | Labor Department; Employment and Training Administration | Labor Department; Employee Benefits Security Administration |
| Type | Final rule | Final rule |
| Action | Final rule. | Final rule. |
| Published | 2026-08-20 | 2026-11-02 |
| Effective | 2026-10-19 | 2027-01-04 |
| Significant | Yes (EO 12866) | Yes (EO 12866) |
| CFR parts | 20 CFR 652 | 29 CFR 2550 |
| Summary | The U.S. Department of Labor (DOL or the Department) is removing the requirement that States use State merit staff to provide Wagner-Peyser Employment Service (ES) services. This final rule allows States to use the staffing model that provides the required services with the most efficient and cost-effective model for their State. | The Department is issuing a final regulation that will require providers of pharmacy benefit management services and affiliated providers of brokerage and consulting services to disclose information about their compensation to fiduciaries of large, self-insured group health plans subject to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA). Pharmacy spending is a major driver of overall healthcare costs for employers and is growing faster than medical and surgical spending. These disclosure requirements apply for purposes of ERISA's statutory prohibited transaction exemption for service arra |
| Document number | 2026-16982 | 2026-22306 |
| Action Urgency Score | 55/100 | 70/100 |
| Peer rank and all 500 records (CSV) | Every comparable record ranked, with amounts, dates and scores 🔒 Click to unlock → |
| Official source URLs for every peer record | Direct links to each record at its government source 🔒 Click to unlock → |

Official records: [Labor Department; Employment and Training Administration](https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/08/20/2026-16982/wagner-peyser-act-employment-service-staffing) · [Labor Department; Employee Benefits Security Administration](https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/11/02/2026-22306/improving-transparency-into-pharmacy-benefit-manager-fee-disclosure)

## Get new rules for your agencies

FederalRegisterCompliancePulse emails new final and proposed rules matching your agencies, with the deadlines.

Download all matching records (CSV) — $4.99 → [See plans](/v/federalregistercompliancepulse#pricing)

Data from the Federal Register API; the published Federal Register document is authoritative. Informational only, not legal advice.

## Often used together

- [EPAPulse](/v/epapulse)
- [SamExclusionsPulse](/v/samexclusionspulse)
- [TxTabcLicenseInformationPulse](/v/txtabclicenseinformationpulse)
- [FranchiseOfferingDisclosureAudit](/franchiseofferingdisclosureaudit)
- [SecurityTxtAndBugBountyKit](/securitytxtkit)
- [AppReviewThemePulse](/appreviewthemepulse)