DemolitionPermitPulse / compare

2307 EUCLID AVE vs 3001 S LAMAR BLVD BLDG G UNIT 200: DemolitionPermitPulse comparison

2307 EUCLID AVE's job value of $2,558,020 is 511.6x 3001 S LAMAR BLVD BLDG G UNIT 200's $5,000 (91st percentile). 2307 EUCLID AVE is dated 2026-07-21; 3001 S LAMAR BLVD BLDG G UNIT 200 2026-10-29.

Data as of · Compiled by Zalwin from City of Austin and City of Chicago open-data building permits (commercial work only)

Both records plus every comparable record, with all columns and source links · Card, Apple Pay, Google Pay or Link via Stripe

How does 2307 EUCLID AVE compare to 3001 S LAMAR BLVD BLDG G UNIT 200?

Field2307 EUCLID AVE3001 S LAMAR BLVD BLDG G UNIT 200
Location2307 EUCLID AVE (Austin, TX)3001 S LAMAR BLVD BLDG G UNIT 200 (Austin, TX)
Permit2026-012615 BP (Building Permit)2026-141941 BP (Building Permit)
WorkDemolitionInterior or partial demolition
DescriptionNew three-story office building demolition of some sidewalks. driveway courtyard area where new building is to be constructedInterior Non Structural Demolition
Job value$2,558,020$5,000
Issued2026-07-212026-10-29
StatusActiveActive
ContractorG Creek INC.SUNRAY CONTRACTING LLC
job value percentile91st21st
Job Opportunity Score55/10058/100
Peer rank and all 223 records (CSV) 🔒 Click to unlock →
Official source URLs for every peer record 🔒 Click to unlock →

Official records: 2307 EUCLID AVE · 3001 S LAMAR BLVD BLDG G UNIT 200

Get new demolition permits weekly

DemolitionPermitPulse can email you new demolition permits in your metros.

See plans

From City of Austin and City of Chicago open-data permit records, which can lag issuance by days and may be revised. Commercial work only: Austin results are commercial-class permits; Chicago results omit house numbers, skip residential job descriptions and, except for signs and elevators, include only jobs of $150K+. Contractor names appear only when the permit lists a company. Confirm details with the city before acting. Not a consumer report and may not be used for FCRA purposes. Informational only.

Often used together