ElevatorInspectPulse / compare

W HIGGINS RD vs W TOUHY AVE: ElevatorInspectPulse comparison

W HIGGINS RD's job value of $77,000 is 1.0x W TOUHY AVE's $76,000 (57th percentile). W HIGGINS RD is dated 2026-08-05; W TOUHY AVE 2026-10-26.

Data as of ยท Compiled by Zalwin from City of Austin and City of Chicago open-data building permits (commercial work only)

Both records plus every comparable record, with all columns and source links ยท Card, Apple Pay, Google Pay or Link via Stripe

How does W HIGGINS RD compare to W TOUHY AVE?

FieldW HIGGINS RDW TOUHY AVE
LocationW HIGGINS RD (Chicago, IL)W TOUHY AVE (Chicago, IL)
Permit101086888 (PERMIT - ELEVATOR EQUIPMENT)101090093 (PERMIT - ELEVATOR EQUIPMENT)
WorkModernization or alterationModernization or alteration
DescriptionREPLACEMENT OF DOOR OPERATORS ON TWO(2) 2000LB CAPACITY, 7-FLOOR, 250FPM, PASSENGER ELEVATORS, PURSUANT TO THE SCOPE OF WORK SUBMITTED.(EV002664)REPLACEMENT OF DOOR OPERATORS ON TWO(2) 3500LB CAPACITY, 12-FLOOR, PASSENGER ELEVATORS(#7-#8), PURSUANT TO THE SCOPE OF WORK SUBMITTED.(EV005047) O'HARE HILTON
Job value$77,000$76,000
Issued2026-08-052026-10-26
ContractorOTIS ELEVATOR - LOMBARDOTIS ELEVATOR - LOMBARD
job value percentile57th56th
Job Opportunity Score45/10070/100
Peer rank and all 371 records (CSV) ๐Ÿ”’ Click to unlock โ†’
Official source URLs for every peer record ๐Ÿ”’ Click to unlock โ†’

Official records: W HIGGINS RD ยท W TOUHY AVE

Get new elevator permits weekly

ElevatorInspectPulse can email you new elevator permits in your metros.

See plans

From City of Austin and City of Chicago open-data permit records, which can lag issuance by days and may be revised. Commercial work only: Austin results are commercial-class permits; Chicago results omit house numbers, skip residential job descriptions and, except for signs and elevators, include only jobs of $150K+. Contractor names appear only when the permit lists a company. Confirm details with the city before acting. Not a consumer report and may not be used for FCRA purposes. Informational only.

Often used together