FemaHazardGrantPulse / compare

CITY OF WORTHINGTON, MINNESOTA vs DAKOTA COUNTY ADMINISTRATION: FemaHazardGrantPulse comparison

CITY OF WORTHINGTON, MINNESOTA's project amount of $2,724,960 is 1.0x DAKOTA COUNTY ADMINISTRATION's $2,629,313 (73rd percentile). CITY OF WORTHINGTON, MINNESOTA is dated 2026-07-31; DAKOTA COUNTY ADMINISTRATION 2026-07-16.

Data as of · Compiled by Zalwin from FEMA Hazard Mitigation Assistance subapplications (OpenFEMA)

Both records plus every comparable MN record, with all columns and source links · Card, Apple Pay, Google Pay or Link via Stripe

How does CITY OF WORTHINGTON, MINNESOTA compare to DAKOTA COUNTY ADMINISTRATION?

FieldCITY OF WORTHINGTON, MINNESOTADAKOTA COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
ApplicantCITY OF WORTHINGTON, MINNESOTADAKOTA COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
Recipient (state/tribe)PUBLIC SAFETY, MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OFPUBLIC SAFETY, MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF
Applicant typeLocal GovernmentLocal Government
StateMNMN
ProgramFlood Mitigation AssistanceBuilding Resilient Infrastructure and Communities
Fiscal year20242025
StatusSubmitted to FEMASubmitted to FEMA
ActivityFlood controlSaferoom/shelter
HazardFloodingTornado
Benefiting countiesNOBLES COUNTYDAKOTA COUNTY
Total amount$2,724,960.12$2,629,313
Federal share$2,043,720.09$1,878,081
Benefit-cost ratio1.162.73
Submitted to FEMA2026-07-312026-07-16
Proposed start2026-09-012027-10-01
FEMA IDEMC-2024-FM-003-0008EMC-2025-BR-002-0007
project amount percentile73rd72nd
Contract Opportunity Score55/10045/100
Peer rank and all 23 MN records (CSV) 🔒 Click to unlock →
Official source URLs for every peer record 🔒 Click to unlock →

Official records: CITY OF WORTHINGTON, MINNESOTA · DAKOTA COUNTY ADMINISTRATION

Get new mitigation projects in your states

FemaHazardGrantPulse emails new or newly selected projects matching your states, programs and minimum amount.

See plans

Data comes from OpenFEMA and reflects FEMA systems as of the last refresh. Newer subapplications are managed in FEMA GO and can appear in OpenFEMA with a delay; amounts and statuses change as projects move through review. Informational only; not procurement or legal advice.

Often used together