FemaHazardGrantPulse / compare

JACKSON COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS vs CITY OF MOSS POINT: FemaHazardGrantPulse comparison

JACKSON COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS's project amount of $9,633,692 is 1.0x CITY OF MOSS POINT's $9,500,000 (89th percentile). JACKSON COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS is dated 2026-06-12; CITY OF MOSS POINT 2026-07-15.

Data as of · Compiled by Zalwin from FEMA Hazard Mitigation Assistance subapplications (OpenFEMA)

Both records plus every comparable MS record, with all columns and source links · Card, Apple Pay, Google Pay or Link via Stripe

How does JACKSON COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS compare to CITY OF MOSS POINT?

FieldJACKSON COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORSCITY OF MOSS POINT
ApplicantJACKSON COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORSCITY OF MOSS POINT
Recipient (state/tribe)MISSISSIPPI EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCYMISSISSIPPI EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY
Applicant typeLocal GovernmentLocal Government
StateMSMS
ProgramBuilding Resilient Infrastructure and CommunitiesBuilding Resilient Infrastructure and Communities
Fiscal year20252025
StatusSubmitted to FEMASubmitted to FEMA
ActivityFlood controlMitigation reconstruction
HazardFloodingTornado
Benefiting countiesJACKSON COUNTYJACKSON COUNTY
Total amount$9,633,692$9,500,000
Federal share$6,877,601$8,550,000
Benefit-cost ratio2.861.09
Submitted to FEMA2026-06-122026-07-15
Proposed start2026-09-012026-08-01
FEMA IDEMA-2025-BR-006-0003EMA-2025-BR-006-0004
project amount percentile89th89th
Contract Opportunity Score65/10055/100
Peer rank and all 34 MS records (CSV) 🔒 Click to unlock →
Official source URLs for every peer record 🔒 Click to unlock →

Official records: JACKSON COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS · CITY OF MOSS POINT

Get new mitigation projects in your states

FemaHazardGrantPulse emails new or newly selected projects matching your states, programs and minimum amount.

See plans

Data comes from OpenFEMA and reflects FEMA systems as of the last refresh. Newer subapplications are managed in FEMA GO and can appear in OpenFEMA with a delay; amounts and statuses change as projects move through review. Informational only; not procurement or legal advice.

Often used together