FemaHazardGrantPulse / compare

NOATAK NATIVE VILLAGE OF vs CHIGNIK BAY TRIBAL COUNCIL: FemaHazardGrantPulse comparison

NOATAK NATIVE VILLAGE OF's project amount of $22,321,900 is 3.5x CHIGNIK BAY TRIBAL COUNCIL's $6,306,037 (96th percentile). NOATAK NATIVE VILLAGE OF is dated 2026-07-23; CHIGNIK BAY TRIBAL COUNCIL 2026-07-22.

Data as of · Compiled by Zalwin from FEMA Hazard Mitigation Assistance subapplications (OpenFEMA)

Both records plus every comparable AK record, with all columns and source links · Card, Apple Pay, Google Pay or Link via Stripe

How does NOATAK NATIVE VILLAGE OF compare to CHIGNIK BAY TRIBAL COUNCIL?

FieldNOATAK NATIVE VILLAGE OFCHIGNIK BAY TRIBAL COUNCIL
ApplicantNOATAK NATIVE VILLAGE OFCHIGNIK BAY TRIBAL COUNCIL
Recipient (state/tribe)NOATAK NATIVE VILLAGE OFCHIGNIK BAY TRIBAL COUNCIL
Applicant typeIndian Tribal GovernmentIndian Tribal Government
StateAKAK
ProgramBuilding Resilient Infrastructure and CommunitiesBuilding Resilient Infrastructure and Communities
Fiscal year20252025
StatusSubmitted to FEMASubmitted to FEMA
ActivityMitigation reconstructionStabilization and restoration
HazardFloodingSevere storm
Benefiting countiesNORTHWEST ARCTIC BOROUGHLAKE AND PENINSULA BOROUGH
Total amount$22,321,900$6,306,037.25
Federal share$20,000,000$5,417,580.82
Benefit-cost ratio1.938.71
Submitted to FEMA2026-07-232026-07-22
Proposed start2027-02-012027-10-01
FEMA IDEMS-2025-BR-019-0001EMS-2025-BR-028-0001
project amount percentile96th85th
Contract Opportunity Score55/10055/100
Peer rank and all 28 AK records (CSV) 🔒 Click to unlock →
Official source URLs for every peer record 🔒 Click to unlock →

Official records: NOATAK NATIVE VILLAGE OF · CHIGNIK BAY TRIBAL COUNCIL

Get new mitigation projects in your states

FemaHazardGrantPulse emails new or newly selected projects matching your states, programs and minimum amount.

See plans

Data comes from OpenFEMA and reflects FEMA systems as of the last refresh. Newer subapplications are managed in FEMA GO and can appear in OpenFEMA with a delay; amounts and statuses change as projects move through review. Informational only; not procurement or legal advice.

Often used together