FemaHazardGrantPulse / compare

SPRINGVILLE CITY CORP vs JORDAN VALLEY WATER CONS DIST: FemaHazardGrantPulse comparison

JORDAN VALLEY WATER CONS DIST's project amount of $67,899,700 is 2.1x SPRINGVILLE CITY CORP's $31,724,900 (99th percentile). SPRINGVILLE CITY CORP is dated 2026-08-03; JORDAN VALLEY WATER CONS DIST 2026-07-17.

Data as of · Compiled by Zalwin from FEMA Hazard Mitigation Assistance subapplications (OpenFEMA)

Both records plus every comparable UT record, with all columns and source links · Card, Apple Pay, Google Pay or Link via Stripe

How does SPRINGVILLE CITY CORP compare to JORDAN VALLEY WATER CONS DIST?

FieldSPRINGVILLE CITY CORPJORDAN VALLEY WATER CONS DIST
ApplicantSPRINGVILLE CITY CORPJORDAN VALLEY WATER CONS DIST
Recipient (state/tribe)DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY STATE UTAHDEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY STATE UTAH
Applicant typeLocal GovernmentSpecial Governmental District
StateUTUT
ProgramFlood Mitigation AssistanceBuilding Resilient Infrastructure and Communities
Fiscal year20242025
StatusSubmitted to FEMASubmitted to FEMA
ActivityFlood controlUtility and infrastructure protection
HazardFloodingEarthquake
Benefiting countiesUTAH COUNTYSALT LAKE COUNTY; UTAH COUNTY
Total amount$31,724,900$67,899,699.82
Federal share$23,793,675$19,810,582.18
Benefit-cost ratio1.242.89
Submitted to FEMA2026-08-032026-07-17
Proposed start2027-01-012027-03-01
FEMA IDEMD-2024-FM-002-0006EMD-2025-BR-001-0009
project amount percentile98th99th
Contract Opportunity Score65/10055/100
Peer rank and all 28 UT records (CSV) 🔒 Click to unlock →
Official source URLs for every peer record 🔒 Click to unlock →

Official records: SPRINGVILLE CITY CORP · JORDAN VALLEY WATER CONS DIST

Get new mitigation projects in your states

FemaHazardGrantPulse emails new or newly selected projects matching your states, programs and minimum amount.

See plans

Data comes from OpenFEMA and reflects FEMA systems as of the last refresh. Newer subapplications are managed in FEMA GO and can appear in OpenFEMA with a delay; amounts and statuses change as projects move through review. Informational only; not procurement or legal advice.

Often used together