FemaHazardGrantPulse / compare

SPRINGVILLE CITY CORP vs WEBER BASIN WATER CONSERVANCY: FemaHazardGrantPulse comparison

WEBER BASIN WATER CONSERVANCY's project amount of $450,000,000 is 14.2x SPRINGVILLE CITY CORP's $31,724,900 (99th percentile). SPRINGVILLE CITY CORP is dated 2026-08-03; WEBER BASIN WATER CONSERVANCY 2026-07-15.

Data as of · Compiled by Zalwin from FEMA Hazard Mitigation Assistance subapplications (OpenFEMA)

Both records plus every comparable UT record, with all columns and source links · Card, Apple Pay, Google Pay or Link via Stripe

How does SPRINGVILLE CITY CORP compare to WEBER BASIN WATER CONSERVANCY?

FieldSPRINGVILLE CITY CORPWEBER BASIN WATER CONSERVANCY
ApplicantSPRINGVILLE CITY CORPWEBER BASIN WATER CONSERVANCY
Recipient (state/tribe)DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY STATE UTAHDEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY STATE UTAH
Applicant typeLocal GovernmentSpecial Governmental District
StateUTUT
ProgramFlood Mitigation AssistanceBuilding Resilient Infrastructure and Communities
Fiscal year20242025
StatusSubmitted to FEMASubmitted to FEMA
ActivityFlood controlUtility and infrastructure protection
HazardFloodingDrought
Benefiting countiesUTAH COUNTYDAVIS COUNTY; WEBER COUNTY
Total amount$31,724,900$450,000,000
Federal share$23,793,675$19,980,000
Benefit-cost ratio1.241.01
Submitted to FEMA2026-08-032026-07-15
Proposed start2027-01-012027-05-01
FEMA IDEMD-2024-FM-002-0006EMD-2025-BR-001-0016
project amount percentile98th99th
Contract Opportunity Score65/10055/100
Peer rank and all 28 UT records (CSV) 🔒 Click to unlock →
Official source URLs for every peer record 🔒 Click to unlock →

Official records: SPRINGVILLE CITY CORP · WEBER BASIN WATER CONSERVANCY

Get new mitigation projects in your states

FemaHazardGrantPulse emails new or newly selected projects matching your states, programs and minimum amount.

See plans

Data comes from OpenFEMA and reflects FEMA systems as of the last refresh. Newer subapplications are managed in FEMA GO and can appear in OpenFEMA with a delay; amounts and statuses change as projects move through review. Informational only; not procurement or legal advice.

Often used together