LobbyingClientPulse / compare
CANADA NICKEL COMPANY INC. vs CANADA NICKEL COMPANY INC.: LobbyingClientPulse comparison
CANADA NICKEL COMPANY INC. (2026-10-09) and CANADA NICKEL COMPANY INC. (2026-10-07) are peer LobbyingClientPulse records.
Data as of · Compiled by Zalwin from U.S. Senate and House Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings via lda.gov; Colorado Secretary of State, NYC City Clerk eLobbyist and City of Chicago Board of Ethics lobbying data
Both records plus every comparable record, with all columns and source links · Card, Apple Pay, Google Pay or Link via Stripe
How does CANADA NICKEL COMPANY INC. compare to CANADA NICKEL COMPANY INC.?
| Field | CANADA NICKEL COMPANY INC. | CANADA NICKEL COMPANY INC. |
|---|---|---|
| Client | CANADA NICKEL COMPANY INC. | CANADA NICKEL COMPANY INC. |
| Client description | Mineral exploration and development company | Mineral exploration and development company |
| Client state | ON | ON |
| Lobbying firm | PUGHE CONSULTING, LLC | JAVELIN ADVISORS LLC |
| Firm state | FL | DC |
| Issue areas | Government Issues | Government Issues |
| Specific matters disclosed | Strategic advisory related to furthering business objectives. | Strategic advisory related to furthering business objectives. |
| Registered | 2026-10-09 | 2026-10-07 |
| Score | 30/100 | 30/100 |
| Peer rank and all 500 records (CSV) | 🔒 Click to unlock → | |
| Official source URLs for every peer record | 🔒 Click to unlock → | |
Official records: CANADA NICKEL COMPANY INC. · CANADA NICKEL COMPANY INC.
Get new registrations in your issue areas
LobbyingClientPulse emails new lobbying registrations matching your issues and states.
From public Lobbying Disclosure Act registrations (lda.gov) and Colorado, New York City and City of Chicago lobbying disclosures. Organization level only: we never list lobbyist, CEO or contact names, and clients whose name reads as a person are left out. Chicago amounts are lobbyist compensation reported for the quarter, summed by client. A registration reports intent to lobby; it is not evidence of wrongdoing.