LobbyingClientPulse / compare

First American Financial Corporation & Affiliated Entities vs Uber Technologies, Inc.: LobbyingClientPulse comparison

First American Financial Corporation & Affiliated Entities (2026-10-29) and Uber Technologies, Inc. (2026-09-01) are peer LobbyingClientPulse records in California.

Data as of · Compiled by Zalwin from U.S. Senate and House Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings via lda.gov; Colorado Secretary of State, NYC City Clerk eLobbyist and City of Chicago Board of Ethics lobbying data

Both records plus every comparable CA record, with all columns and source links · Card, Apple Pay, Google Pay or Link via Stripe

How does First American Financial Corporation & Affiliated Entities compare to Uber Technologies, Inc.?

FieldFirst American Financial Corporation & Affiliated EntitiesUber Technologies, Inc.
ClientFirst American Financial Corporation & Affiliated EntitiesUber Technologies, Inc.
Client descriptionFinancial/InvestmentTransportation
Client stateCACA
Issue areasFinancial/InvestmentTransportation
Registered2026-10-292026-09-01
JurisdictionColorado stateColorado state
Lobbying firmBrownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck, LLP
Score60/10030/100
Peer rank and all 123 CA records (CSV) 🔒 Click to unlock →
Official source URLs for every peer record 🔒 Click to unlock →

Official records: First American Financial Corporation & Affiliated Entities · Uber Technologies, Inc.

Get new registrations in your issue areas

LobbyingClientPulse emails new lobbying registrations matching your issues and states.

See plans

From public Lobbying Disclosure Act registrations (lda.gov) and Colorado, New York City and City of Chicago lobbying disclosures. Organization level only: we never list lobbyist, CEO or contact names, and clients whose name reads as a person are left out. Chicago amounts are lobbyist compensation reported for the quarter, summed by client. A registration reports intent to lobby; it is not evidence of wrongdoing.

Often used together