LobbyingClientPulse / compare
Upstream Policies, Inc. vs ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP: LobbyingClientPulse comparison
Upstream Policies, Inc. (2026-10-05) and ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP (2026-09-16) are peer LobbyingClientPulse records in Delaware.
Data as of · Compiled by Zalwin from U.S. Senate and House Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings via lda.gov; Colorado Secretary of State, NYC City Clerk eLobbyist and City of Chicago Board of Ethics lobbying data
Both records plus every comparable DE record, with all columns and source links · Card, Apple Pay, Google Pay or Link via Stripe
How does Upstream Policies, Inc. compare to ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP?
| Field | Upstream Policies, Inc. | ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP |
|---|---|---|
| Client | Upstream Policies, Inc. | ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP |
| Client description | Environmental Services | Research, development, and manufacturing of pharmaceutical products |
| Client state | DE | DE |
| Issue areas | Environmental Services | Pharmacy, Copyright/Patent/Trademark, Trade (domestic/foreign) |
| Registered | 2026-10-05 | 2026-09-16 |
| Jurisdiction | Colorado state | |
| Lobbying firm | Independent lobbyist (individual) | |
| Firm state | DC | |
| Specific matters disclosed | Issues related to pharmaceuticals, intellectual property, and trade · Issues related to pharmaceuticals, intellectual property, and trade · Issues related to pharmaceuticals, intellectual property, and trade | |
| Score | 30/100 | 60/100 |
| Peer rank and all 12 DE records (CSV) | 🔒 Click to unlock → | |
| Official source URLs for every peer record | 🔒 Click to unlock → | |
Official records: Upstream Policies, Inc. · ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP
Get new registrations in your issue areas
LobbyingClientPulse emails new lobbying registrations matching your issues and states.
From public Lobbying Disclosure Act registrations (lda.gov) and Colorado, New York City and City of Chicago lobbying disclosures. Organization level only: we never list lobbyist, CEO or contact names, and clients whose name reads as a person are left out. Chicago amounts are lobbyist compensation reported for the quarter, summed by client. A registration reports intent to lobby; it is not evidence of wrongdoing.