LobbyingClientPulse / compare
Upstream Policies, Inc. vs PHYSICIANS FOR AMERICAN HEALTHCARE ACCESS: LobbyingClientPulse comparison
Upstream Policies, Inc. (2026-10-05) and PHYSICIANS FOR AMERICAN HEALTHCARE ACCESS (2026-10-06) are peer LobbyingClientPulse records in Delaware.
Data as of · Compiled by Zalwin from U.S. Senate and House Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings via lda.gov; Colorado Secretary of State, NYC City Clerk eLobbyist and City of Chicago Board of Ethics lobbying data
Both records plus every comparable DE record, with all columns and source links · Card, Apple Pay, Google Pay or Link via Stripe
How does Upstream Policies, Inc. compare to PHYSICIANS FOR AMERICAN HEALTHCARE ACCESS?
| Field | Upstream Policies, Inc. | PHYSICIANS FOR AMERICAN HEALTHCARE ACCESS |
|---|---|---|
| Client | Upstream Policies, Inc. | PHYSICIANS FOR AMERICAN HEALTHCARE ACCESS |
| Client description | Environmental Services | nonprofit of internatl medical graduates committed to improving health care access in US |
| Client state | DE | DE |
| Issue areas | Environmental Services | Immigration |
| Registered | 2026-10-05 | 2026-10-06 |
| Jurisdiction | Colorado state | |
| Lobbying firm | POLSINELLI PC | |
| Firm state | DC | |
| Specific matters disclosed | Issues related to international medical graduates | |
| Score | 30/100 | 30/100 |
| Peer rank and all 12 DE records (CSV) | 🔒 Click to unlock → | |
| Official source URLs for every peer record | 🔒 Click to unlock → | |
Official records: Upstream Policies, Inc. · PHYSICIANS FOR AMERICAN HEALTHCARE ACCESS
Get new registrations in your issue areas
LobbyingClientPulse emails new lobbying registrations matching your issues and states.
From public Lobbying Disclosure Act registrations (lda.gov) and Colorado, New York City and City of Chicago lobbying disclosures. Organization level only: we never list lobbyist, CEO or contact names, and clients whose name reads as a person are left out. Chicago amounts are lobbyist compensation reported for the quarter, summed by client. A registration reports intent to lobby; it is not evidence of wrongdoing.