LobbyingClientPulse / compare
CONFEDERATED TRIBES OF SILETZ INDIANS vs COALITION OF LARGE TRIBES (COLT): LobbyingClientPulse comparison
CONFEDERATED TRIBES OF SILETZ INDIANS (2026-10-14) and COALITION OF LARGE TRIBES (COLT) (2026-10-19) are peer LobbyingClientPulse records.
Data as of · Compiled by Zalwin from U.S. Senate and House Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings via lda.gov; Colorado Secretary of State, NYC City Clerk eLobbyist and City of Chicago Board of Ethics lobbying data
Both records plus every comparable record, with all columns and source links · Card, Apple Pay, Google Pay or Link via Stripe
How does CONFEDERATED TRIBES OF SILETZ INDIANS compare to COALITION OF LARGE TRIBES (COLT)?
| Field | CONFEDERATED TRIBES OF SILETZ INDIANS | COALITION OF LARGE TRIBES (COLT) |
|---|---|---|
| Client | CONFEDERATED TRIBES OF SILETZ INDIANS | COALITION OF LARGE TRIBES (COLT) |
| Client description | Native American tribe | Large Tribe Interest |
| Client state | OR | SD |
| Lobbying firm | Independent lobbyist (individual) | RAGNAR GROUP LLC |
| Firm state | NC | VA |
| Issue areas | Indian/Native American Affairs, Gaming/Gambling/Casino | Indian/Native American Affairs |
| Specific matters disclosed | Issues regarding tribes and gaming. · Issues regarding tribes and gaming. | Agriculture Issues |
| Registered | 2026-10-14 | 2026-10-19 |
| Score | 45/100 | 30/100 |
| Peer rank and all 500 records (CSV) | 🔒 Click to unlock → | |
| Official source URLs for every peer record | 🔒 Click to unlock → | |
Official records: CONFEDERATED TRIBES OF SILETZ INDIANS · COALITION OF LARGE TRIBES (COLT)
Get new registrations in your issue areas
LobbyingClientPulse emails new lobbying registrations matching your issues and states.
From public Lobbying Disclosure Act registrations (lda.gov) and Colorado, New York City and City of Chicago lobbying disclosures. Organization level only: we never list lobbyist, CEO or contact names, and clients whose name reads as a person are left out. Chicago amounts are lobbyist compensation reported for the quarter, summed by client. A registration reports intent to lobby; it is not evidence of wrongdoing.