LobbyingClientPulse / compare
SECURE AI PROJECT INC. vs PARALLEL WIRELESS, INC.: LobbyingClientPulse comparison
SECURE AI PROJECT INC. (2026-10-09) and PARALLEL WIRELESS, INC. (2026-10-02) are peer LobbyingClientPulse records.
Data as of · Compiled by Zalwin from U.S. Senate and House Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings via lda.gov; Colorado Secretary of State, NYC City Clerk eLobbyist and City of Chicago Board of Ethics lobbying data
Both records plus every comparable record, with all columns and source links · Card, Apple Pay, Google Pay or Link via Stripe
How does SECURE AI PROJECT INC. compare to PARALLEL WIRELESS, INC.?
| Field | SECURE AI PROJECT INC. | PARALLEL WIRELESS, INC. |
|---|---|---|
| Client | SECURE AI PROJECT INC. | PARALLEL WIRELESS, INC. |
| Client description | Artificial Intelligence (AI) Policy Advocacy organization. | Software company |
| Client state | CA | NH |
| Lobbying firm | SECURE AI PROJECT INC. | TSG ADVOCATES DC, LLC |
| Firm state | CA | DC |
| Issue areas | Science/Technology | Science/Technology, Government Issues |
| Specific matters disclosed | Legislation pertaining to the frontier AI industry (FRONTIER Act, MATCH Act, CATS Risk Act, etc.) | Government relations and growth assistance · Government relations and growth assistance |
| Registered | 2026-10-09 | 2026-10-02 |
| Score | 45/100 | 60/100 |
| Peer rank and all 500 records (CSV) | 🔒 Click to unlock → | |
| Official source URLs for every peer record | 🔒 Click to unlock → | |
Official records: SECURE AI PROJECT INC. · PARALLEL WIRELESS, INC.
Get new registrations in your issue areas
LobbyingClientPulse emails new lobbying registrations matching your issues and states.
From public Lobbying Disclosure Act registrations (lda.gov) and Colorado, New York City and City of Chicago lobbying disclosures. Organization level only: we never list lobbyist, CEO or contact names, and clients whose name reads as a person are left out. Chicago amounts are lobbyist compensation reported for the quarter, summed by client. A registration reports intent to lobby; it is not evidence of wrongdoing.