NyEconomicIncentivePulse / compare

China Institute in America, Inc. vs Brooklyn Navy Yard Development Corporation: NyEconomicIncentivePulse comparison

Brooklyn Navy Yard Development Corporation's project investment of 5,912,691 is 1.5x China Institute in America, Inc.'s 4,004,375 (75th percentile). China Institute in America, Inc. is dated 2026-03-26; Brooklyn Navy Yard Development Corporation 2026-05-21.

Data as of · Compiled by Zalwin from New York State Database of Economic Incentives (Empire State Development and other state agencies, data.ny.gov)

Both records plus every comparable record, with all columns and source links · Card, Apple Pay, Google Pay or Link via Stripe

How does China Institute in America, Inc. compare to Brooklyn Navy Yard Development Corporation?

FieldChina Institute in America, Inc.Brooklyn Navy Yard Development Corporation
RecipientChina Institute in America, Inc.Brooklyn Navy Yard Development Corporation
ProjectChina Institute in America CapitalBNYDC Accessibility Improvements DRI III
ProgramRegional Council Capital Fund, ESDDowntown Revitalization Initiative, ESD
AssistanceGrant: $335,000Grant: $853,700
Total project investment$4,004,375$5,912,691
IndustryEducational ServicesReal Estate Rental and Leasing
LocationNew York County, 10006, New York CityKings County, 11215, New York City
Start date2026-03-262026-05-21
Jobs to create / retain (FTE)3 / 300 / 0
project investment percentile69th75th
Score60/10070/100
Peer rank and all 169 records (CSV) 🔒 Click to unlock →
Official source URLs for every peer record 🔒 Click to unlock →

Official records: China Institute in America, Inc. · Brooklyn Navy Yard Development Corporation

Get new funded projects in your region

NyEconomicIncentivePulse emails new New York State awards matching your region, assistance type and minimum project size.

See plans

From the New York State Database of Economic Incentives, which state agencies update quarterly; the start date is the award or contract start reported by the agency. Award amounts are commitments and may be disbursed over years or reduced. Recipients named like individuals are excluded; contact names and street addresses are not shown.

Often used together