SignPermitPulse / compare

N WACKER DR vs W ROOSEVELT RD: SignPermitPulse comparison

W ROOSEVELT RD's job value of $8,787 is 1.0x N WACKER DR's $8,500 (87th percentile). N WACKER DR is dated 2026-08-13; W ROOSEVELT RD 2026-10-27.

Data as of ยท Compiled by Zalwin from City of Austin and City of Chicago open-data building permits (commercial work only)

Both records plus every comparable record, with all columns and source links ยท Card, Apple Pay, Google Pay or Link via Stripe

How does N WACKER DR compare to W ROOSEVELT RD?

FieldN WACKER DRW ROOSEVELT RD
LocationN WACKER DR (Chicago, IL)W ROOSEVELT RD (Chicago, IL)
Permit101086658 (PERMIT - SIGNS)101088677 (PERMIT - SIGNS)
WorkIlluminated or electric signIlluminated or electric sign
DescriptionJUST SALAD: INTERNALLY ILLUMINATED FACE-LIT SUSPENDED WINDOW SIGN MOUNTED, INTERIOR MOUNTED (W RANDOLPH ST ELEVATION) - 3'-4" H X 9'-5" W (31 SQ FT)B1) WE KINDLY REQUEST A PERMIT TO INSTALL AN ILLUMINATED CABINET SIGN, READING PLANET FITNESS. THIS SIGN WOULD REPLACE THE JOANN FABRICS CABINET SIGN ON THE FRONT ELEVATION ON THE WEST END.
Job value$8,500$8,787
Issued2026-08-132026-10-27
ContractorCITY SERVICE ELECTRIC INC.SIGNCO INC
job value percentile86th87th
Job Opportunity Score33/10058/100
Peer rank and all 500 records (CSV) ๐Ÿ”’ Click to unlock โ†’
Official source URLs for every peer record ๐Ÿ”’ Click to unlock โ†’

Official records: N WACKER DR ยท W ROOSEVELT RD

Get new sign permits weekly

SignPermitPulse can email you new sign permits in your metros.

See plans

From City of Austin and City of Chicago open-data permit records, which can lag issuance by days and may be revised. Commercial work only: Austin results are commercial-class permits; Chicago results omit house numbers, skip residential job descriptions and, except for signs and elevators, include only jobs of $150K+. Contractor names appear only when the permit lists a company. Confirm details with the city before acting. Not a consumer report and may not be used for FCRA purposes. Informational only.

Often used together