WaPublicWorksIntentPulse / compare

Graham Const & Management Inc vs Trenchless Const Services LLC: WaPublicWorksIntentPulse comparison

Trenchless Const Services LLC's contract of 5,530,875 is 1.1x Graham Const & Management Inc's 4,878,000 (99th percentile). Graham Const & Management Inc is dated 2026-10-15; Trenchless Const Services LLC 2026-10-19.

Data as of · Compiled by Zalwin from Washington State Department of Labor & Industries prevailing wage Statements of Intent (data.wa.gov)

Both records plus every comparable record, with all columns and source links · Card, Apple Pay, Google Pay or Link via Stripe

How does Graham Const & Management Inc compare to Trenchless Const Services LLC?

FieldGraham Const & Management IncTrenchless Const Services LLC
CompanyGraham Const & Management IncTrenchless Const Services LLC
RolePrime contractorPrime contractor
AgencySnohomish County Public Hospital District #1 (Port, transit, utility or special district)Chelan County Public Utility District #1 (Port, transit, utility or special district)
ContractSnohomish Clinic / MO207Unit Price Directional Drill Utility Installation / 25-14242
Project citySnohomishChelan, Manson,Wenatchee
Company contract amount$4,878,000$5,530,875
Prime contract amount$4,878,000$5,530,875
Awarded2026-10-022025-09-22
Expected start2026-12-012026-09-22
Intent filed2026-10-152026-10-19
contract percentile99th99th
Score80/10065/100
Peer rank and all 500 records (CSV) 🔒 Click to unlock →
Official source URLs for every peer record 🔒 Click to unlock →

Official records: Graham Const & Management Inc · Trenchless Const Services LLC

Get new public works intents

WaPublicWorksIntentPulse emails new Washington prevailing wage intents matching your roles, agency types and contract sizes.

See plans

From Washington L&I prevailing wage Statements of Intent on data.wa.gov. Amounts and dates are as filed by the contractor; an intent records that work is planned under a public contract, not its completion or payment. Agency contacts and filings under personal names are excluded. Verify with L&I or the awarding agency.

Often used together